Question #84367

Answer in 3 to 4 sentences

1. why can't we see matter as a particle and a wave?
2. use a similar example to explain the wave particle duality?

Expert's answer

Answer on Question # 84367, Physics / Quantum Mechanics

Question 1. 1. why can’t we see matter as a particle and a wave?

2. use a similar example to explain the wave particle duality?

Solution.

1. To answer this, we need to consider the mathematics of the matter-wave (or De Broglie wave) and one of the most important and ubiquitous elements of quantum physics: Planck’s constant hh. The parameters of the matter-wave are given by the relationship: λ=h/p\lambda=h/p, where pp is the magnitude of the particle’s momentum. Let’s compare this to the De Broglie wavelength of the average human being running for a bus, running straight into a lamp-post. Let’s take the average global body mass of 62kg62\,kg and let’s say our running speed is 3m/s3\,m/s when we hit the post. Which gives us:

λ=6.631034Js62kg3m/s=3.561036m.\lambda=\frac{6.63\cdot 10^{-34}\,Js}{62\,kg\cdot 3\,m/s}=3.56\cdot 10^{-36}\,m.

As we can see the De Broglie wavelength for a macroscopic object is incredibly small. The tiny value of Planck’s constant is the reason we don’t see particle-wave duality in the macroscopic world.

2. Now for an electron with a mass of 1030kg10^{-30}\,kg travelling at roughly six million meters per second, the De Broglie wavelength is:

λe=6.631034Js1030kg6106m/s=1.1051010m.\lambda_{e}=\frac{6.63\cdot 10^{-34}\,Js}{10^{-30}\,kg\cdot 6\cdot 10^{6}\,m/s}=1.105\cdot 10^{-10}\,m.

Diffraction only occurs when the size of the wavelength of the travelling wave or particle is comparable in size to the gap through which it passes or the object around which it’s diffracting. λe\lambda_{e} is roughly about a tenth of a nanometre.

Bonus:

For example, light is not a wave and it’s not a particle. Light is a quantum field, or at least that’s our current best description of it.

Quantum fields can behave in ways that appear to be wave like, and they can also behave in ways that appear to be particle like, and this the origin of the claim that light is both a wave and a particle. It’s more accurate to say that light can behave like both a wave and a particle.

Anyhow, as far as I know quantum fields can’t behave like a wave and like a particle at the same time. Generally speaking they behave like waves when propagating and like particles when exchanging energy. So we can’t have a wave of particles or a particle of waves. It’s one or the other.

Incidentally, this applies to all particles and not just light. \Box

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS