Question #42129

A piledriver hammer of mass 150 kg falls freely through a distance of 5 m to strike a pile of mass 400 kg and drives it 75 mm into the ground. The hammer does not rebound when driving the pile. Determine the average resistance of the ground.

Compare and contrast the use of D’Alembert’s principle with the principle of conservation of energy when solving the problem

Expert's answer

Answer on Question #42129-Physics-Mechanics

A piledriver hammer of mass 150kg150\mathrm{kg} falls freely through a distance of 5m5\mathrm{m} to strike a pile of mass 400kg400\mathrm{kg} and drives it 75mm75\mathrm{mm} into the ground. The hammer does not rebound when driving the pile. Determine the average resistance of the ground.

Compare and contrast the use of D'Alembert's principle with the principle of conservation of energy when solving the problem.

Solution

Finding velocity v1 of the hammer immediately before impact with the pile using equation for linear motion.


v12=u2+2g(h2h1)v1=(0+(29.815))=98.1=9.9ms.v _ {1} ^ {2} = u ^ {2} + 2 g (h _ {2} - h _ {1}) \rightarrow v _ {1} = \sqrt {\left(0 + (2 \cdot 9 . 8 1 \cdot 5)\right)} = \sqrt {9 8 . 1} = 9. 9 \frac {\mathrm {m}}{\mathrm {s}}.


Finding velocity of pile immediately after impact using principle of conservation of momentum.

Momentum of system = Momentum of system

before impact after impact


m1v1=(m1+m2)v2v2=m1v1(m1+m2)=1509.9(150+400)=2.7ms.m _ {1} v _ {1} = (m _ {1} + m _ {2}) v _ {2} \rightarrow v _ {2} = \frac {m _ {1} v _ {1}}{(m _ {1} + m _ {2})} = \frac {1 5 0 \cdot 9 . 9}{(1 5 0 + 4 0 0)} = 2. 7 \frac {m}{s}.


Finding retardation aa , of pile if final velocity, v3=0v_{3} = 0 .


v32=v22+2a(h3h2)a=v32v222(h3h2)=02.7220.075=48.6ms2.v _ {3} ^ {2} = v _ {2} ^ {2} + 2 a (h _ {3} - h _ {2}) \rightarrow a = \frac {v _ {3} ^ {2} - v _ {2} ^ {2}}{2 (h _ {3} - h _ {2})} = \frac {0 - 2 . 7 ^ {2}}{2 \cdot 0 . 0 7 5} = - 4 8. 6 \frac {\mathrm {m}}{\mathrm {s} ^ {2}}.


(The minus sign denotes retardation and can be ignored in the following calculation).

Finding resistance of ground.


FG=(m1+m2)g+(m1+m2)a=(m1+m2)(a+g)=(150+400)(9.81+48.6)=32.1kN.F_{G} = (m_{1} + m_{2})g + (m_{1} + m_{2})a = (m_{1} + m_{2})(a + g) = (150 + 400)(9.81 + 48.6) = 32.1\mathrm{kN}.

Compare and contrast the use of D'Alembert's principle with the principle of conservation of energy to solve an engineering problem.

Finding velocity v1 of the hammer immediately before impact with the pile using principle of conservation of energy.

Loss of PE = Gain of KE


m1g(h2h1)=m1v122v1=(29.815)=98.1=9.9ms.m _ {1} g (h _ {2} - h _ {1}) = \frac {m _ {1} v _ {1} ^ {2}}{2} \rightarrow v _ {1} = \sqrt {(2 \cdot 9 . 8 1 \cdot 5)} = \sqrt {9 8 . 1} = 9. 9 \frac {\mathrm {m}}{\mathrm {s}}.


Finding velocity of pile immediately after impact using principle of conservation of momentum.


Momentum of system=Momentum of system\text{Momentum of system} = \text{Momentum of system}before impactafter impact\text{before impact} \quad \text{after impact}m1v1=(m1+m2)v2v2=m1v1(m1+m2)=1509.9(150+400)=2.7ms.m _ {1} v _ {1} = (m _ {1} + m _ {2}) v _ {2} \rightarrow v _ {2} = \frac {m _ {1} v _ {1}}{(m _ {1} + m _ {2})} = \frac {1 5 0 \cdot 9 . 9}{(1 5 0 + 4 0 0)} = 2. 7 \frac {m}{s}.


Finding the average resistance of the ground using principle of conservation of energy.

Work done = Change of PE + Change of KE + Work done against friction


W=(m1+m2)g(h3h2)+12(m1+m2)(v32v22)+FG(h2h3).W = (m _ {1} + m _ {2}) g (h _ {3} - h _ {2}) + \frac {1}{2} (m _ {1} + m _ {2}) (v _ {3} ^ {2} - v _ {2} ^ {2}) + F _ {G} (h _ {2} - h _ {3}).


(Where there is no external work input to the system i.e. W=0W = 0 ).


0=(50+400)9.81(00.075)+12(150+400)(02.72)+FG0.075FG=32.1kN.0 = (5 0 + 4 0 0) \cdot 9. 8 1 \cdot (0 - 0. 0 7 5) + \frac {1}{2} \cdot (1 5 0 + 4 0 0) (0 - 2. 7 2) + F _ {G} \cdot 0. 0 7 5 \rightarrow F _ {G} = 3 2. 1 \mathrm {k N}.


In comparing the two methods, it might be concluded that in this particular case there is very little to choose between them. The method used in the first case required 4 separate calculations whereas the energy method used in the second case required only 3. The final one in the second case was however a lengthy calculation. Both methods required use of the principle of conservation of momentum to determine the value of velocity immediately after impact of the hammer. Both methods return identical answers with the same degree of accuracy.

http://www.AssignmentExpert.com/


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS