1) Let "V_1" be the velocity of the first train and "V_2" be the velocity of the second train. We know that "V_1(0)=80\\,km\/h =80000\\,m\/h"
and
"V_2=25\\,km\/h =25000\\,m\/h."
Let "\\Delta V(t) = V_1(t)-V_2(t)" be the relative velocity of trains. If "a" is deceleration (so it is a negative value), we get
"V_1(t) = V_1(0) +at." (1)
Therefore, the relative velocity can be written as
"\\Delta V(t) = V_1(0) +at-V_2 = (V_1(0)-V_2) + at."
We know the initial distance and we should calculate the time t, at which the distance will be equal to 0. For a motion with constant acceleration or deceleration with initial velocity "(V_1(0)-V_2)" we get
"S=(V_1(0)-V_2)T + \\dfrac{aT^2}{2}," (2)
where T is the time from the beginning till the collision.
We may rewrite this formula using (1) and get
"S = \\dfrac{(\\Delta V(T))^2-(V_1(0)-V_2)^2}{2a},"
where "\\Delta V(T)" is the relative velocity of 1st train in a moment of collision.
Therefore
"(\\Delta V(T))^2 =2aS+(V_1(0)-V_2)^2" and "\\Delta V(T) =\\sqrt{2aS+(V_1(0)-V_2)^2} = \\sqrt{-2\\cdot 2.6\\,m\/s^2\\cdot50\\,m + \\Big(\\dfrac{80000\\,m\/h-25000\\,m\/h}{3600\\,s}\\Big)^2} = \\sqrt{-26\/6\\,m^2\/s^2}."
This result is not confusing, because the modulus of deceleration is too big, so trains could nor collide.
If we rewrite the second equation as
"\\dfrac{aT^2}{2} + (V_1(0)-V_2)T -S = 0" ,
and calculate the discriminant
"D = (V_1(0)-V_2)^2 +4\\dfrac{a}{2}S = \\Big(\\dfrac{80000\\,m\/h-25000\\,m\/h}{3600\\,s}\\Big)^2 - 2\\cdot2.6\\,m\/s^2\\cdot50\\,m = -26.6\\,m^2\/s^2,"
we see that the equation has no real roots! So the answer is:the trains never collide for such a big deceleration.
2) If "l" is length of the area and "w" is the width of the area, then the perimeter is
"p = 2(l+w)."
Then we get an equation
"p = 2\\Big(4x + \\dfrac{3x^2}{2}\\Big) = 8x + 3x^2."
a) we know that "p=350\\,m." So we should find the non-negative roots of an equation
"3x^2+8x-350 = 0" ,
we get "x_1 = 9.55, \\quad x_2 = -12.22."
So we choose "x=9.55." Therefore "l=4x=4\\cdot9.55=38.2\\,m , \\,\\, w = \\dfrac{3x^2}{2} = \\dfrac{3\\cdot9.55^2}{2} =136.8\\,m."
Note that if we decide that the value of 350 accounts the uncertainty of the measurements, we will get an equation
"p = 2\\Big(4x + 0.12 + \\dfrac{3x^2}{2} + 0.24 \\Big) = 8x + 3x^2 + 0.72."
Solving this equation, we get
"x_1 = 9.54, \\quad x_2 = -12.21,"
so "l=4\\cdot9.54 = 38.16\\,m, \\;\\; w = \\dfrac{3\\cdot9.54^2}{2}=136.5\\,m."
b) The area can be calculated as "S=l\\cdot w = 38.2\\,m\\cdot136.8\\,m = 5225.8\\,m^2." If we take the uncertainty
c) Let us determine the percentage uncertainty in the length and width (see also https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/A%20Level/Physics/2015/Specification%20and%20sample%20assessments/Appendix%2010%20Updated.pdf page 4).
Percentage uncertainty in length "= \\dfrac{0.12\\,m}{38.2\\,m} = 0.00314 \\approx 0.31\\%," percentage uncertainty in width "=\\dfrac{0.24\\,m}{136.8\\,m} = 0.00175 \\approx 0.18\\%."
If we get the percentage uncertainty of the product of two values, we should add the percentage uncertainties in length and in width to get "0.31\\%+0.18\\% = 0.49\\%."
Comments
Leave a comment