Philosophy Answers

Symbolic Logic

2. Construct proofs for the following arguments.

~(3x)(Px' Qx' (Rx = Tx», (x)(Px = (~ Sx v (Ax ::J Bx»), ~(3x)(Ax' ~ Sx), ~ (3x)(Qx' ~ (Px v Tx», (x)«Px = Rx) ::J Ax) I .". (x)(Qx ::J (Tx v Bx»  

Understanding Symbolic Logic by Virginia Klenk 4th ed

5. Construct proofs for the following theorems of predicate logic.

f. (x)(Fx-> ~ (Gxv Hx))-> ~ (∃x) (Fx·Hx)

Question 8

Define the concept of phenomenology. (5)

How can you practice the principle of Ubuntu during your teaching practice phase using the following principles

1)caring

2) Humble

3) socially sensitive

4) Hospitable

“It is moral to give to charity.” This sentence could mean two different things about

the moral permissibility and obligatoriness of giving to charity. Why is this the case?

Explain the two different meanings.

“It is moral to give to charity.” This sentence could mean two different things about the moral permissibility and obligatoriness of giving to charity. Why is this the case? Explain the two different meanings.

Environmental factors influence Global PR. technological systems is one of those factors. With the nationwide pandemic of Covid -19, Public Relations PR practitioners depended entirely on their technological systems to raise awareness about the virus. Discuss the technological systems used in your country to raise awareness about Covid-19. (15)

How african philosophy of education emphasis ubuntu

The Ethics of Advertising) “Both deceptive advertising and depth advertising are sometimes morally permissible. They are only immoral if they are advertising immoral products.” Do you agree with the statement? Your answer should include a clear description of both forms of advertising (using real or invented examples), as well as an analysis of at least two arguments against each.

1.1 “It is moral to give to charity.” This sentence could mean two different things about the moral permissibility and obligatoriness of giving to charity. Why is this the case? Explain the two different meanings. (4 marks)

1.2 “It is wrong to make jokes about COVID-19, because these jokes could cause offence.” Formalize this argument, separating out its two premises and conclusion. Is the argument valid? (3 marks)

1.3 Which premise of your formalized version of the argument in 1.3 is the normative premise? Give a counterexample to this premise which indicates that it is not consistent with our considered moral judgements. (2 marks)

1.4 Is there a moral difference between the enlightened shareholder view and classical shareholder primacy views? Briefly explain your answer. (2 marks) 1.6 Briefly explain the utilitarian view of distributive justice