Answer to Question #240004 in Philosophy for Zach

Question

1. There are 2 major approaches in doing Philosophy: Speculative philosophy and Analytical Philosophy. in your own perspective, how will you differentiate these two approaches using one scenario that happened in your life? Explain why the scenario become speculative and why it become analytical



2. In your words, define and discuss the concept of " Philosophy"?




3.How does Freedom affect these (3) concept that humans experience? Morality, Religion, and Democracy. Explain your answers and give an example/ scenario that can prove your explanation.

Answer 1

Question 1

The difference between the practical and speculative levels of intelligence is that the speculative is only concerned in the facts for its own sake, whereas the practice is only concerned in the truth for its own sake. The practical intellect is bound by the world as well, but its purity is further delimited by a goal or operation.

A notable reasoning in analytic ethics, for instance, implicated whether moral judgment statements (e.g., "It is morally unacceptable to tell a blatant lie") are depictions of some characterization of the world, in which case the statements might be valid or invalid, or are just assertions of the subject's perceptions.

Question 2

Philosophy is the analysis of general and profound issues, such as those about reality, reason, understanding, virtues, consciousness, and lexicon. These kind of issues are frequently posed as problems to be investigated or handled.

Question 3

A person with perfect freedom of choice would act if moral law actually gives a positive concept of freedom. It decides to act on moral law in order to keep its independence, and we have the option of doing the same. By behaving morally, we can set ourselves free.

"Religious tolerance does not equal religious liberty." "The Constitution genuinely provides that there shall be no legislation favoring an institution of religion, or restricting the free practice therein," my friend Rob Boston said in response to the claim.

Every person has the right to think, believe, have political opinions, and choose whether or not to follow the rules of his or her chosen religion. Individual liberty, nevertheless, cannot be presumed to be limitless in a developed and democratic community.