Explain one criticisms of the logical positivist’s principle of verification? Do you agree or disagree with any of the criticisms? Justify your answer.
One of the criticisms of logical positivist’s theory of verification is the non-empirical proposition seen to be tautologically true or meaningless as an arbitrary characterization of significance. I agree with this criticism because the principle is a tautology, although a non-arbitrary one that reflects actual utilization and stringently futile to be regarded as a reference for the conduct of methodical inquiry.
Comments
Leave a comment