Conservationists don't vote for republicans, but some democrats are conservationist. Thus, democrats don;t vote for republicans.
A.Is the argument valid? If not what rule is broken?
B. What type of claim is the conclusion?
1
Expert's answer
2020-05-25T11:53:04-0400
The second premise of the above syllogism is particular, and the conclusion is not particular. Therefore, this syllogism is invalid. It breaks the rule that if one premise is particular, then the conclusion must be particular.
Numbers and figures are an essential part of our world, necessary for almost everything we do every day. As important…
APPROVED BY CLIENTS
"assignmentexpert.com" is professional group of people in Math subjects! They did assignments in very high level of mathematical modelling in the best quality. Thanks a lot
Comments
Leave a comment