Question #94428
#1 In an experiment designed to study the effects of illumination level on task performance (“Performance of Complex
Tasks Under Different Levels of Illumination,” J. Illuminating Eng., 1976: 235-242), subjects were required to insert a
fine-tipped probe into the eyeholes of ten needles in rapid succession both for a low light level with a black background
and a higher level with a white background. Each data value is the time (sec) required to complete the task.
Background Subject

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Black 25.85 28.84 32.05 25.74 20.89 41.05 25.01 24.96 27.47
White 18.23 20.84 22.96 19.68 19.50 24.98 16.61 16.07 24.59
Does the data indicate that the higher level of illumination yields a decrease of more than 5 sec in true average task
completion time?
1
Expert's answer
2019-09-13T10:36:33-0400

Given data suggest that the paired tt test should be used.

The paired tt test

When D=XY,μD=μ1μ2D=X-Y, \mu_D=\mu_1-\mu_2 and null hypothesis


H0:μD=0H_0:\mu_D=\triangle_0

the test statistic value for testing the hypothesis is


t=dˉ0sD/n,t={\bar{d}-\triangle_0 \over s_D/\sqrt{n}},

where dˉ\bar{d} and sDs_D are the sample mean and the sample standard deviation of differences di,d_i, respectively.

In order to use this test assume that the differences DiD_i are from a normal distribution.


BlackgroundSubjectBlack,xiWhite,yiDifference,di=xiyi125.8518.237.62228.8420.848.00332.0522.969.09425.7419.686.06520.8919.501.39641.0524.9816.07725.0116.618.40824.9616.078.89927.4724.592.88\def\arraystretch{1.5} \begin{array}{c:c:c:c} \begin{array}{cc} Blackground \\ Subject \end{array} & \begin{array}{cc} Black, \\ x_i \end{array} & \begin{array}{cc} White, \\ y_i \end{array} &\begin{array}{cc} Difference, \\ d_i=x_i-y_i \end{array} \\ \hline 1 & 25.85 & 18.23 &7.62 \\ 2 & 28.84 & 20.84 & 8.00 \\ 3 & 32.05 & 22.96 & 9.09 \\ 4 & 25.74 & 19.68 & 6.06 \\ 5 & 20.89 & 19.50 &1.39 \\ 6 & 41.05 & 24.98 & 16.07 \\ 7 & 25.01 & 16.61& 8.40 \\ 8 & 24.96 & 16.07& 8.89 \\ 9 & 27.47 & 24.59 & 2.88 \\ \hline \end{array}

The sample mean dˉ\bar{d} for the difference

dˉ=7.62+8.00+9.09+6.06+1.39+16.07+8.40+8.89+2.889=7.60\bar{d}={7.62+8.00+9.09+6.06+1.39+16.07+8.40+8.89+2.88\over 9}=7.60

The sample variance is


sD2=1n1i=1n(didˉ)2s_D^2={1 \over n-1}\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^n{(d_i-\bar{d})^2}

sD2=s_D^2=

=191((7.627.60)2+(8.007.60)2+(9.097.60)2+={1 \over9-1}((7.62-7.60)^2+(8.00-7.60)^2+(9.09-7.60)^2+

+(6.067.60)2+(1.397.60)2+(16.077.60)2++(6.06-7.60)^2+(1.39-7.60)^2+(16.07-7.60)^2+

+(8.407.60)2+(8.897.60)2+(2.887.60)2)=+(8.40-7.60)^2+(8.89-7.60)^2+(2.88-7.60)^2)=


=17.45495=17.45495

and the sample standard deviation


sD=sD2=17.454954.1779s_D=\sqrt{s_D^2}=\sqrt{17.45495}\approx4.1779

The hypotheses are:


H0:μD=5H_0: \mu_D=5

H1:μD>5H_1: \mu_D>5

The test statistic value is


t=7.6054.1779/91.8670t={7.60-5 \over 4.1779/\sqrt{9}}\approx1.8670

The degrees of the freedom are: df=n1=91=8.df=n-1=9-1=8.

The P value


P=P(T>1.8670)=0.049431P=P(T>1.8670)=0.049431

P=0.049431<0.05<0.1P=0.049431<0.05<0.1

Reject the null hypothesis at a significance level 0.1 and 0.05.


P=0.049431>0.01P=0.049431>0.01

Do not reject the null hypothesis at a significance level 0.01.


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS