Question #93443
mean amount of juice
is 250ml.
a random sample of cartons and found that the mean amount of juice
258ml with a standard deviation of 16ml. Using the 1% significance level
Find the rejection region(s) and calculate the test statistics
1
Expert's answer
2019-09-02T09:09:24-0400

Hypothesis Test For Population Mean μ\mu.


H0:μ=250H_0: \mu=250H1:μ250(Twotailed test)H_1:\mu \not=250 (Two-tailed \ test)

Since σ\sigma is unknown, then we use tt-statistic. The random variable Xˉμs/n{\bar{X}-\mu \over s/\sqrt{n}} has a Student's t-distribution with df=n1df=n-1 degrees of freedom. We reject H0H_0 if t<tα/2;n1t<-t_{\alpha/2;n-1} or t>tα/2;n1t>t_{\alpha/2;n-1}.

Given that α=0.01,μ=250,Xˉ=258,s=16.\alpha=0.01, \mu=250, \bar{X}=258, s=16. What is the value of n?

Let n=25.n=25. Then df=n1=251=24.df=n-1=25-1=24. Define the critical value from the table


tα/2;n1=t0.01/2;251=t0.005;24=2.797t_{\alpha/2;n-1}=t_{0.01/2;25-1}=t_{0.005;24}=2.797

The rejection region for this two-tailed test is


R={t:t>2.797}R=\{t:|t|>2.797\}Xˉμs/n=25825016/25=2.500{\bar{X}-\mu \over s/\sqrt{n}}={258-250 \over 16/\sqrt{25}}=2.500

Decision about the null hypothesis

Since it is observed that t=2.500<2.797,|t|=2.500<2.797, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.

Conclusion

It is concluded that the null hypothesis H0H_0 is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ\mu is different than 250, at the 0.01 significance level.

From the analysis of the table of critical values we see that if we increase nn (and the number of degrees of freedom) and don't change the value of α\alpha, then the critical value decreases.

On the other hand if we increase nn and don't change Xˉ,μ,s\bar{X}, \mu, s the random variable Xˉμs/n{\bar{X}-\mu \over s/\sqrt{n}} increases.


Let n=30.n=30. Then df=n1=301=29.df=n-1=30-1=29. Define the critical value from the table


tα/2;n1=t0.01/2;301=t0.005;29=2.756t_{\alpha/2;n-1}=t_{0.01/2;30-1}=t_{0.005;29}=2.756

The rejection region for this two-tailed test is


R={t:t>2.756}R=\{t:|t|>2.756\}Xˉμs/n=25825016/30=2.739{\bar{X}-\mu \over s/\sqrt{n}}={258-250 \over 16/\sqrt{30}}=2.739

Decision about the null hypothesis

Since it is observed that t=2.739<2.756,|t|=2.739<2.756, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.

Conclusion

It is concluded that the null hypothesis H0H_0 is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ\mu is different than 250, at the 0.01 significance level.


Let n=31.n=31. Then df=n1=311=30.df=n-1=31-1=30. Define the critical value from the table


tα/2;n1=t0.01/2;311=t0.005;30=2.750t_{\alpha/2;n-1}=t_{0.01/2;31-1}=t_{0.005;30}=2.750

The rejection region for this two-tailed test is


R={t:t>2.750}R=\{t:|t|>2.750\}Xˉμs/n=25825016/31=2.784{\bar{X}-\mu \over s/\sqrt{n}}={258-250 \over 16/\sqrt{31}}=2.784

Decision about the null hypothesis

Since it is observed that t=2.784>2.750,|t|=2.784>2.750, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.

Conclusion

It is concluded that the null hypothesis H0H_0 is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ\mu is different than 250, at the 0.01 significance level. Therefore, the machine needs adjustment.


If we take n30n\leq30 there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ\mu is different than 250, at the 0.01 significance level.

If we take n31n\geq31 there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ\mu is different than 250, at the 0.01 significance level. Therefore, the machine needs adjustment.


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS