Question #47829

24. Rosalie Friend (2001), and educational psychologist, compared three methods of teaching writing. Students were randomly assigned to three different experimental conditions involving different methods of writing a summary. At the end of the two days of instructions, participants wrote a summary. One of the ways it was scored was the percentage of specific details of information it included from the original material. Here is a selection from her article describing one of the findings:

The effect of summarization method on inclusion of important information was significant F(2, 144) = 4.1032, p < .019. The mean scores (with standard deviations in parantheses) were as follows: Argument Repetition, 59.6% (17.9); Generalization, 59.8% (15.2); and Self-Reflection, 50.2% (18.0). (p.14)
1

Expert's answer

2014-10-17T10:00:12-0400

Answer on Question #47829 – Math – Statistics and Probability

24. Rosalie Friend (2001), and educational psychologist, compared three methods of teaching writing. Students were randomly assigned to three different experimental conditions involving different methods of writing a summary. At the end of the two days of instructions, participants wrote a summary. One of the ways it was scored was the percentage of specific details of information it included from the original material. Here is a selection from her article describing one of the findings:

The effect of summarization method on inclusion of important information was significant F(2,144) = 4.1032, p < .019. The mean scores (with standard deviations in parentheses) were as follows: Argument Repetition, 59.6% (17.9); Generalization, 59.8% (15.2); and Self-Reflection, 50.2% (18.0). (p.14)

a. Explain these results to a person who has never had a course in statistics.

b. Using the information in the preceding description, figure the effect size for the study.

Solution

a. The mean score is average (arithmetic mean) of students result. The standard deviation measures the amount of variation or dispersion from the mean score.

b. The effect size (using Cohen's dd) would equal


r=dd2+4,r = \frac{d}{\sqrt{d^2 + 4}},


where d=M1M2SD12+SD222d = \frac{M_1 - M_2}{\sqrt{\frac{SD_1^2 + SD_2^2}{2}}}, M1M_1 and M2M_2 are mean values of the first and second dataset, SD1SD_1 and SD2SD_2 standard deviations of the first second data set.

Then for Argument Repetition and Generalization d0.012d \approx -0.012, the effect size r0.006r \approx -0.006.

Then for Argument Repetition and Self-Reflection d0.524d \approx 0.524, the effect size r0.253r \approx 0.253.

Then for Generalization and Self-Reflection d0.576d \approx 0.576, the effect size r0.277r \approx 0.277.

www.AssignmentExpert.com


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS