Question #345998

A random sample of 25 brand A cigarettes showed an average nicotine content of 5 milligrams, while a sample of 40 brand D cigarettes showed average nicotine of 4.8 milligrams. If the standard deviation of nicotine is 1.6 milligrams, would you say that brand D has a lesser nicotine content? Use a 0.01 level of significance. Assume the distribution of nicotine content to be normal

1
Expert's answer
2022-05-30T15:57:14-0400

The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:

H0:μ1μ2H_0:\mu_1\le\mu_2

H0:μ1>μ2H_0:\mu_1>\mu_2

This corresponds to a right-tailed test, and a z-test for two means, with known population standard deviations will be used.

Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.01,\alpha = 0.01, and the critical value for a right-tailed test is zc=2.3263z_c = 2.3263

The rejection region for this right-tailed test is R={z:z>2.3263}.R = \{z: z > 2.3263\}.

The z-statistic is computed as follows:


z=Xˉ1Xˉ2σ12/n1+σ22/n2z=\dfrac{\bar{X}_1-\bar{X}_2}{\sqrt{\sigma_1^2/n_1+\sigma_2^2/n_2}}

=54.81.62/25+1.62/400.4903=\dfrac{5-4.8}{\sqrt{1.6^2/25+1.6^2/40}}\approx0.4903

Since it is observed that z=0.49zc=2.326,z = 0.49 \le z_c = 2.326, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.

Using the P-value approach:

The p-value is p=P(Z>0.4903)=0.311961,p=P(Z>0.4903)=0.311961, and since p=0.311961>0.01,p=0.311961>0.01, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.

Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ1\mu_1is greater than μ2,\mu_2, at the α=0.01\alpha = 0.01 significance level.

Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that brand D has a lesser nicotine content, at the α=0.01\alpha = 0.01 significance level.


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS