A researcher claims that adult hogs fed a special diet will have an average weight of 200 pounds. A sample of 10 hogs has an average weight 198.2 pounds and standard deviation of 3.3 pounds. At a= 0.05, can the claim be rejected? Also, find the 95% confidence interval of the true mean?
The critical value for "\\alpha = 0.05" and "df = n-1 = 9" degrees of freedom is "t_c = z_{1-\\alpha\/2; n-1} = 2.262156."
The corresponding confidence interval is computed as shown below:
"=(198.2-2.262156\\times\\dfrac{3.3}{\\sqrt{10}},"
"198.2+2.262156\\times\\dfrac{3.3}{\\sqrt{10}})"
"=(195.839,200.561)"
Therefore, based on the data provided, the 95% confidence interval for the population mean is "195.839 < \\mu < 200.561\n\n," which indicates that we are 95% confident that the true population mean "\\mu" is contained by the interval "(195.839, 200.561)."
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0:\\mu=200"
"H_a:\\mu\\not=200"
This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a t-test for one mean, with unknown population standard deviation, using the sample standard deviation, will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha = 0.05," "df=n-1=9" degrees of freedom, and the critical value for a two-tailed test is "t_c =2.262156."
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is "R = \\{t: |t| > 2.262156\\}."
The t-statistic is computed as follows:
Since it is observed that "|t| = 1.7249 \\le 2.262156=t_c ," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Using the P-value approach:
The p-value for two-tailed "df=9" degrees of freedom, "t=-1.7249" is "p=0.118631," and since "p=0.118631>0.05=\\alpha," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu" is different than 200, at the "\\alpha = 0.05" significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment