It has been reported that 40% of the adult population participate in computer hobbies during their leisure time. A random sample of 180 adults found that 65 engaged in computer hobbies. at a= 0.01, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion differs from 40%?
The following null and alternative hypotheses for the population proportion needs to be tested:
"H_0:p=0.4"
"H_a:p\\not=0.4"
This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a z-test for one population proportion will be used.
The z-statistic is computed as follows:
The p-value is "p =2P(Z<-1.0650)= 2(0.143438)"
"=0.286876."
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha = 0.01," and the critical value for a two-tailed test is "z_c = 2.5758."
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is "R = \\{z: |z|>2.5758\\}."
Since it is observed that "|z| = 1.0650 <2.5758= z_c ," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value is "p =0.286876," and since "p = 0.286876 \\ge 0.01=\\alpha," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population proportion "p" is different than 0.40, at the "\\alpha = 0.01" significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment