The CEO of a battery manufacturing company claimed that their batteries would last an average of 280 hours under normal use. A researcher randomly selected 20 batteries from the production line and tested them. The tested batteries had a mean life span of 250 hours with a standard deviation of 40 hours. Do we have enough evidence to suggest that the claim of an average of 280 hours is false?
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0:\\mu=280"
"H_1:\\mu\\not=280"
This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a t-test for one mean, with unknown population standard deviation, using the sample standard deviation, will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha = 0.05," "df=n-1=20-1=19" degrees of freedom, and the critical value for a two-tailed test is "t_c = 2.093024"
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is"R = \\{t: |t| > 2.023024\\}."
The t-statistic is computed as follows:
Since it is observed that "|t| = 3.354102 >2.093024= t_c," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Using the P-value approach:
The p-value for two-tailed, "df=19" degrees of freedom, "t=-3.354102" is "p = 0.003333," and since "p=0.003333<0.05=\\alpha," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu" is different than 280, at the "\\alpha = 0.05" significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment