Question #282489

A health officer is trying to study the malaria situation of Ethiopia. From the records of

seasonal blood survey (SBS) results he came to understand that the proportion of people

having malaria in Ethiopia was 3.8% in 1978 (Eth. Cal). The size of the sample

considered was 15000. He also realised that during the year that followed (1979), blood

samples were taken from 10,000 randomly selected persons. The result of the 1979

seasonal blood survey showed that 200 persons were positive for malaria. Help the

health officer in testing the hypothesis that the malaria situation of 1979 did not show

any significant difference from that of 1978 (take the level of significance, α =.01).


1
Expert's answer
2021-12-27T04:08:18-0500
p^1=0.038,N1=15000,X1=0.038(15000)=570\hat{p}_1=0.038, N_1=15000, X_1=0.038(15000)=570

p^2=X2N2=20010000=0.02,N2=10000,X2=200\hat{p}_2=\dfrac{X_2}{N_2}=\dfrac{200}{10000}=0.02, N_2=10000, X_2=200

The value of the pooled proportion is computed as 


pˉ=X1+X2N1+N2=570+20015000+10000=0.0308\bar{p}=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{N_1+N_2}=\dfrac{570+200}{15000+10000}=0.0308

The following null and alternative hypotheses for the population proportion needs to be tested:

H0:p1=p2H_0:p_1=p_2

H1:p1p2H_1:p_1\not=p_2

This corresponds to a two-tailed test, and a z-test for two population proportions will be used.

Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.01,\alpha = 0.01, and the critical value for a two-tailed test is zc=2.5758.z_c = 2.5758.

The rejection region for this two-tailed test is R={z:z>2.5758}.R = \{z: |z| > 2.5758\} .

The z-statistic is computed as follows:


z=p^1p^2pˉ(1pˉ)(1N1+1N2)z=\dfrac{\hat{p}_1-\hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\bar{p}(1-\bar{p})(\dfrac{1}{N_1}+\dfrac{1}{N_2})}}

=0.0380.020.0308(10.0308)(115000+110000)=\dfrac{0.038-0.02}{\sqrt{0.0308(1-0.0308)(\dfrac{1}{15000}+\dfrac{1}{10000})}}

=8.0699=8.0699

Since it is observed that z=8.0699>2.5758=zc,|z| = 8.0699 > 2.5758=z_c , it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.

Using the P-value approach: The p-value is p=2P(Z>8.0699)0,p=2P(Z>8.0699)\approx0, and since p=0<0.01=α,p = 0 < 0.01=\alpha, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population proportion p1p_1

is different than p2,p_2, at the α=0.01\alpha = 0.01 significance level.


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS