The director of admissions at a large university says that 15% of high school juniors to whom she sends university literature eventually apply for admission. In a sample of 300 persons to whom materials were sent, 30 students applied for admission. In a two-tail test at the 0.05 level of significance, should we reject the director’s claim?
The following null and alternative hypotheses for the population proportion needs to be tested:
"H_0:p=0.15"
"H_1:p\\not=0.15"
This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a z-test for one population proportion will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha = 0.05," and the critical value for a two-tailed test is"z_c = 1.96."
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is "R = \\{z: |z| > 1.96\\}."
The z-statistic is computed as follows:
"\\approx-2.4254"
Since it is observed that "|z| = 2.425 > 1.96=z_c ," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value is "p=2P(z<-2.4254)= 0.0152934," and since "p= 0.0152934<0.05," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population proportion "p" is different than 0.15, at the "\\alpha = 0.05" significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment