. One such theory hypothesizes that people should spontaneously follow a
24-hour cycle of sleeping and waking-even if they are not exposed to the usual pattern of
sunlight. To test this notion, 8 paid volunteers were placed in a room in which there was no light from the outside and no clocks or other indicators of time. After a month in the room, each individual developed a cycle. Their cycles at the end of the study were as follows: 25, 27, 25, 23, 24, 25, 26, 25. Using the .05 significance level, determine if these participants’ cycles are different from a 24-hour cycle.
SS = 10,
Sample mean = 25
1.what is the null hypothesis?
2.what is the research hypothesis?
3.What is the comparison mean?
4.what is the comparison distribution?
5.What is/are the cutoff(s)?
6.what is the t score for the sample score?
7.How is the denominator of a t-score different from the denominator of a z-score?
8.what is your conclusion for this hypothesis test?
1.
The null hypothesis to be tested in this question is,
2.
The research hypothesis is the alternative hypothesis and it is given as,
3.
The comparison mean is the sample mean and its value is given as,
, where and
Therefore,
4.
The comparison distribution used is the student's t distribution. It is used because the population variance is unknown and the sample size is considerably small.
5.
The cutoffs are the t-table values that leaves an area of each to the right and to the left with degrees of freedom. The values are given as,
and since the t distribution is symmetric about the mean.
Therefore, the cut off points are,
6.
The t-score for the sample is given as,
In order to determine the sample standard deviation , we first evaluate for the variance given as,
Now,
Thus
The t score for the sample score is
7.
The denominator of both scores is the standard error and it is given as,
for a Z-score and for a t-score. The main difference is that the standard error for a t-score is smaller than the standard error for a Z-score.
8.
For this hypothesis test, the null hypothesis is rejected if
Since , we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that sufficient evidence exist to show that participants’ cycles are different from a 24-hour cycle at 5% level of significance.
Comments