the bad debt ratio for a financial institution is defined to be the dollar value of loans defaulted divided by the total dollar value of all loans made.
The bad debt ratio for a financial institution is defined to be the dollar value of loans defaulted divided by the total dollar value of all loans made. Suppose that a random sample of seven Ohio banks is selected and that the bad debt ratios (written in percentages) for these banks are 7%, 4%, 6%, 7%, 5%, 4%, and 9%. Banking officials claim that the mean bad debt ratio for all Midwestern banks is 7% and that the mean debt ratio for Ohio banks is lower. Is this a correct claim?
"H_0: \\mu = 7 \\\\\n\nH_1: \\mu < 7 \\\\\n\n\\bar{x} = 6 \\\\\n\ns = 1.826 \\\\\n\nn=7"
Test-statistic
"t = \\frac{\\bar{x} - \\mu}{s \/ \\sqrt{n}} \\\\\n\nt = \\frac{6-7}{1.826 \/ \\sqrt{7}} = -1.449"
P-value = P(t < -1.449) = 0.0988
Since P-value is greater then α=0.05 we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
There is enough evidence to support the claim. The claim is correct.
Comments
Leave a comment