performance of 40 teachers in the Mathematics department showed a mean of 95 with a standard deviation of 7.3.
The performance of 50 teachers from the faculty of engineering showed a mean of 98 with a standard deviation of 9.2, while, a sample of 40 teachers from the college of science showed an average performance of 95 with a standard deviation of 7.3. Is there a difference in performance between the two samples? Use α = 0.05
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0: \\mu_1 = \\mu_2 \\\\\n\nH_1: \\mu_1 \u2260 \\mu_2"
This corresponds to a two-tailed test.
Level of significance =0.05
Sincesample sizes are greater than 30 so z-test for two means, with unknown population standard deviations will be used.
Under null hypothesis the test statistic is obtained as:
"Z = \\frac{\\bar{x_1} - \\bar{x_2}}{\\sqrt{s^2_1\/n_1 + s^2_2\/n_2}} \\\\\n\n= \\frac{98-95}{\\sqrt{(9.2)^2\/50 + (7.3)^2\/40}} \\\\\n\n= 1.725"
Based on the information provided, the significance level is 0.05, and the critical value for a two-tailed test is "Z_c =1.96"
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is
"R = {Z:|Z|>1.96}"
Since it is observed that
"|Z| = 1.725 < Z_c = 1.96"
It is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu_1" is different than "\\mu_2" at 0.05 significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment