Question #248888

A milk processing company test implemented a plant-wide energy conservation program with a goal of reducing the mean daily consumption rate of at least 1,000 kWh from its normal operating plants. The conservation program was implemented in Plant B. The following data was collected on weekdays where consumption level is at its peak. Were the conservation efforts effective in achieving its goal? Compare the results with Plant A’s data where the program is not implemented using 𝛼 = 0.05. Assume that the population variances are not equal.

 Plant A (kWh) 3,952.80 3,276.00 3,636.00 3,636.00 3,636.00 3,636.00 4,068.00 4,068.00 4,362.00 4,362.00 4,362.00 4,362.00 3,882.00 3,808.80 3,808.80

Plant B (kWh) 4,036.00 4,036.00 4,036.00 3,264.00 864.00 1,368.00 2,196.00 4,392.00 5,220.00 3,600.00 3,960.00 4,428.00 756.00 612.00 684.00


1
Expert's answer
2021-10-17T17:41:08-0400

The solution is based on Welch’s Test

X = energy consumption rate for Plant A

Y = energy consumption rate for Plant B

H0:μ1μ21000H1:μ1μ2>1000H_0: \mu_1- \mu_2 \leq 1000 \\ H_1: \mu_1- \mu_2 > 1000

Test-statistic:

t=(XˉYˉ)1000s12n1+s22n2Xˉ=3952.80+3276.00+...+3808.80+3808.8015=3923.633Yˉ=4036.00+4036.00+...+612.00+684.0015=2896.80s12=(3952.803923.633)2+(3276.003923.633)2+...+(3808.803923.633)2+(3808.803923.633)2151=113572.4452s22=(4036.002896.8)2+(4036.002896.8)2+...+(612.002896.8)2+(684.002896.8)2151=2663639.3143t=(3923.6332896.8)1000113572.445215+2663639.314315=26.833185147.44=0.0623α=0.05df=151=14t0.05,14=1.7613t= \frac{(\bar{X} - \bar{Y})-1000}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_1}{n_1}+\frac{s^2_2}{n_2}}} \\ \bar{X}=\frac{3952.80 + 3276.00+...+3808.80 + 3808.80}{15} = 3923.633 \\ \bar{Y} = \frac{4036.00+4036.00+...+612.00+684.00}{15} = 2896.80 \\ s^2_1= \frac{(3952.80-3923.633)^2+(3276.00-3923.633)^2+...+(3808.80-3923.633)^2+(3808.80-3923.633)^2}{15-1}= 113572.4452 \\ s^2_2 = \frac{(4036.00-2896.8)^2+(4036.00-2896.8)^2+...+(612.00-2896.8)^2+(684.00-2896.8)^2}{15-1} = 2663639.3143 \\ t= \frac{(3923.633 -2896.8)-1000}{\sqrt{\frac{113572.4452}{15}+\frac{2663639.3143}{15}}} \\ = \frac{26.833}{\sqrt{185147.44}} \\ = 0.0623 \\ α=0.05 \\ df= 15-1= 14 \\ t_{0.05, 14} = 1.7613

One-tailed test. Reject H0 if tt0.05,14t ≥ t_{0.05, 14}

So, calculated t is less than critical t-value. So, we accept the null hypothesis.

There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the claim is NOT valid at 0.05 level of significance. Hence, we conclude that energy conservation program does not reduce the mean consumption rate at least by 1000 kWh.


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS