A manager will switch to a new technology if the production process exceeds 80 units per hour. The manager asks the company statistician to test the null hypothesis: H0: μ = 80 against the alternative hypothesis: H1: μ >80 If there is strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis then the new technology will be adopted. Past experience has shown that the standard deviation is 8. A data set with n = 25 for the new technology has a sample mean of 83. Does this justify adoption of the new technology?
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0: \\mu=80"
"H_1: \\mu>80"
This corresponds to a right-tailed test, for which a z-test for one mean, with known population standard deviation will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha=0.05," and the critical value for a right-tailed test is "z_c=1.6449."
The rejection region for this right-tailed test is "R=\\{z:z>1.6449\\}."
The z-statistic is computed as follows:
Since it is observed that "z=1.875>1.6449=z_c," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value is "p=P(Z>1.875)=0.030396," and since "p=0.030396<0.05=\\alpha," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu" is greater than 80, at the "\\alpha=0.05" significance level.
Therefore, there is enough evidence to adopt the new technology , at the "\\alpha=0.05" significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment