In March 2014, the Gallup Organization found in a survey that 42% of U.S. adults think global warming is greatly exaggerated. The number of adults polled was 1,048.
Can we say that less than half (significantly more than 50% at an alpha level of .05, using a two-tailed alpha test – this means .025 in each tail) of U.S. adults believe global warming is greatly exaggerated? Here the p for your H0 (null hypothesis) is p=.50. is the p you should use in your standard error (SE) formula.
This same survey finds that 68% Republicans believe global warming is greatly exaggerated compared to 18% Democrats. The survey is that same as above - administered to 1,048 adults, 400 of whom were Republicans and 450 of whom were Democrats (the rest were independents)
Using information from question #1, with hypothesis testing can we say that fewer Democrats think global warming is exaggerated than Republicans? Why or why not? Use an alpha level of .01 this time with a two-tailed test (99% confidence).
1
Expert's answer
2021-05-07T14:38:36-0400
(1)n=1048,p=0.42
(2) Let Ho:p<0.5 , Half of the U.S. adults believe that global warming is greatly exaggerated
and Ha:p>0.5, Not half of the US adults believe that global warming is greatly exaggerated.
As p−value>αi.e.0.05 , So Null hypothesis is accepted. There is enough evidence to support the claim that Half of the US adults believe that global warming is greatly exaggerated.
(3) p_1=0.68,p_2=0.18,n_1=400,n_2=450
(4) Let Ho:p2′<p1′, fewer Democrats think global warming is exaggerated than Republicans
As p−value>α, so Null hypothesis is accepted, There is enough evidence to support the claim that fewer Democrats think global warming is exaggerated than Republicans
"assignmentexpert.com" is professional group of people in Math subjects! They did assignments in very high level of mathematical modelling in the best quality. Thanks a lot
Comments