Question #15728

A researcher collected data on a sample of 301 patients. The variable of interest was the percentage of subjects with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). IFG refers to a metabolic stage intermediate between normal glucose homeostasis and diabetes. In the study, 24 patients were classified in the IFG stage. The article cites population estimates for IFG among all patients in that area as 6.3 percent. Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the population of patients has a prevalence of IFG different from 6.3 percent? Use a level of significance of 0.01 to conduct the test.

Expert's answer

H0:p=0.063;H _ {0}: p = 0. 0 6 3;H1:p0.063;H _ {1}: p \neq 0. 0 6 3;phat=24301=0.0797;p - h a t = \frac {2 4}{3 0 1} = 0. 0 7 9 7;p=6.3100=0.063;p = \frac {6 . 3}{1 0 0} = 0. 0 6 3;z=(0.0797.063)0.063(10.063)301=1.1925;z = \frac {\left(0 . 0 7 9 7 - . 0 6 3\right)}{\sqrt {0 . 0 6 3 \cdot \frac {\left(1 - 0 . 0 6 3\right)}{3 0 1}}} = 1. 1 9 2 5;


critical _ z=+/2.58z = + / - 2.58 at 0.01 level and two-tailed test.

Hence, computed z=1.1925z = 1.1925 is in the interval (2.58,2.58)(-2.58, 2.58) . So, fail to reject H0H_0 .

And we can make next conclusion: that there is no sufficient evidence to indicate that the population of patients has a prevalence of IFG difference from 6.3%6.3\% .

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS