Off types:
"n_1 = 13"
"\\bar x_1=\\frac{\\sum x_i}{n}\\frac{4.47+5.88+6.21+5.55+6.09+5.70+5.82+4.84+5.59+5.59+5.22+4.45+6.76}{13}=5.55"
"s_1=\\sqrt{\\frac{\\sum(\\bar x_1 - x_i)^2}{n-1}}=0.67"
Aberrant:
"n_2 = 12"
"\\bar x_2=\\frac{6.48+6.36+4.28+7.71+6.40+7.06+5.51+8.93+7.71+7.20+7.37+5.91}{12}=6.74"
"s_2=\\sqrt{\\frac{\\sum(\\bar x_2-x_i)^2}{n-1}}=1.2"
Since samples are less than 30 in this problem we are dealing with t-distirbution with n1 + n2 – 2 = 13 + 12 – 2 = 23 degrees of freedom.
The table t-value for a 90% confidence interval with 23 df is t0.05, 23 = 1.714
The formula for a 90% confidence interval for the difference of two population means:
where
"s_p=\\sqrt{\\frac{s_1^2(n_1-1)+s_2^2(n_2-1)}{n_1+n_2-2}}""s_p=\\sqrt{\\frac{0.67^2\\cdot12+1.2^2\\cdot11}{12+13-2}}=0.96"
Confidence interval:
"(5.55-6.74)\\pm1.714\\cdot0.96\\sqrt{\\frac{1}{12}+\\frac{1}{13}}=-1.19\\pm0.66"
We are 90% confident that the difference in the two population means is between –1.85 and –0.53. Zero is not in this interval so there is a significant difference in the average rubber production between “off types” and “aberrant” plants.
"H_0:\\mu_1=\\mu_2"
"H_a:\\mu_1\\ne\\mu_2"
The hypothesis test is two-tailed. Since samples are less than 30 and the population standard deviations are unknown this is t-test.
The critical value for significance level "\\alpha=0.1" and df = 23 is t0.05, 23 = "\\pm" 1.714
The critical region is (-∞, -1.714] ∪ [1.714, ∞)
Test statistic:
Since –3.1 < –1.714 thus t falls in the rejection region, we reject the null hypothesis.
At the 10% significance level the data do provide sufficient evidence to not support the claim. We are 90% confident to conclude that two types of plants have not equal average rubber production.
Comments
Leave a comment