Question #135917
You are tasked with investigating whether fake news media platform and personality are independent. Consider the table below to help you with your task.
Celebrity. C/ Politician .P/ Sport Star .SS/ Total
Social Media .SM/ 1800 700 515 3015
Traditional Media. TM/ 485 350 150 985
Total 2285 1050 775 4000

Consider the statements below. Assume the level of significance is 1%
A. We reject the null hypothesis
B. We do not reject the null hypothesis
C. Media platform and personality are independent

Which statements are correct?
1. Only A
2. Only B
3. Only C
4. A and C Only
5. B and C only
1
Expert's answer
2020-10-01T10:14:23-0400
CPSSTotalSM18007005153015TM485350150985Total228510506654000\def\arraystretch{1.5} \begin{array}{c:c:c:c:c} & C & P & SS & Total \\ \hline SM & 1800 & 700 & 515 & 3015 \\ \hdashline TM & 485 & 350 & 150 & 985 \\ \hdashline Total & 2285 & 1050 & 665 & 4000 \end{array}

The expected values are computed in terms of row and column totals. In fact, the formula is



Eij=Ri×CjT,E_{ij}=\dfrac{R_i\times C_j}{T},

where RiR_i corresponds to the total sum of elements in row i,i, CjC_j corresponds to the total sum of elements in column j,j, and TT is the grand total.



E11=3015×22854000=1722.31875E_{11}=\dfrac{3015\times 2285}{4000}=1722.31875E12=3015×10504000=791.4375E_{12}=\dfrac{3015\times 1050}{4000}=791.4375




E13=3015×6654000=501.24375E_{13}=\dfrac{3015\times 665}{4000}=501.24375E21=985×22854000=562.68125E_{21}=\dfrac{985\times 2285}{4000}=562.68125E22=985×10504000=258.5625E_{22}=\dfrac{985\times 1050}{4000}=258.5625E23=985×6654000=163.75625E_{23}=\dfrac{985\times 665}{4000}=163.75625

The table below shows the calculations to obtain the table with expected values:



Expected ValuesCPSSTotalSM1722.32791.44501.243015TM562.68258.56163.76985Total228510506654000\def\arraystretch{1.5} \begin{array}{c:c:c:c:c} Expected\ Values & C & P & SS & Total \\ \hline SM & 1722.32 & 791.44& 501.24 & 3015 \\ \hdashline TM & 562.68 & 258.56 & 163.76 & 985 \\ \hdashline Total & 2285 & 1050 & 665 & 4000 \end{array}

Based on the observed and expected values, the squared distances can be computed according to the following formula: (EO)2E.\dfrac{(E-O)^2}{E}. The table with squared distances is shown below:



Squared DistancesCPSSSM3.50410.5640.378TM10.72432.3361.156\def\arraystretch{1.5} \begin{array}{c:c:c:c} Squared\ Distances & C & P & SS \\ \hline SM & 3.504 & 10.564 & 0.378 \\ \hdashline TM & 10.724 & 32.336 & 1.156 \end{array}

The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:

H0:H_0: The two variables are independent.

H1:H_1: The two variables are dependent.

This corresponds to a Chi-Square test of independence.

Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.05,\alpha=0.05, the number of degrees of freedom is df=(21)×(31)=2,df=(2-1)\times(3-1)=2, so then the rejection region for this test is R={χ2:χ2>5.991}.R=\{\chi^2:\chi^2>5.991\}.

The Chi-Squared statistic is computed as follows:



χ2=3.504+10.724+10.564+32.336+\chi^2=3.504+10.724+10.564+32.336++0.378+1.156=58.661+0.378+1.156=58.661

Since it is observed that χ2=58.661>5.991=χc2,\chi^2=58.661>5.991=\chi_c^2, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the two variables are dependent, at the 0.05 significance level.


1. Only A statement is correct.


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS