T-test for two Means – Unknown Population Standard Deviations
The provided sample means are : "\\bar{X}_1=7.52,\\bar{X}_2=7.48."
The provided sample standard deviations are: "s_1=0.024,s_2=0.032,"
and the sample sizes are "n_1=6,n_2=5."
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0:\\mu_1=\\mu_2"
"H_1:\\mu_1\\not=\\mu_2"
This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a t-test for two population means, with two independent samples, with unknown population standard deviations will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha=0.05," and the degrees of freedom are "df=9." In fact, the degrees of freedom are computed as follows, assuming that the population variances are equal.
Hence, it is found that the critical value for this two-tailed test is "t_c=2.262," for "\\alpha=0.05" and "df=9." The rejection region for this two-tailed test is "R=\\{t:|t|>2.262\\}."
Since it is assumed that the population variances are equal, the t-statistic is computed as follows:
"={7.52-7.48\\over \\sqrt{{(6-1)(0.024)^2+(5-1)(0.032)^2\\over 6+5-2}({1\\over 6}+{1\\over 5})}}\\approx1.78"
Since it is observed that "|t|=1.78\\leq2.262," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu_1" is different than "\\mu_2" at the 0.05 significance level.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value is "p=0.1089," and since "p=0.1089\\geq0.05," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu_1" is different than "\\mu_2" at the 0.05 significance level.
Comments
Dear Jen campos, please use the panel for submitting new questions.
The rejection or acceptance of a hypothesis is dependent on the statistical interval of the critical values which is dictated by the confidence level or level of significance. A 95% level of confidence means a 0.05 level of significance. Sometimes a hypothesis is rejected at 0.01 but accepted at 0.05. When this happens, which level of significance would you adopt and why.
Leave a comment