Question #6102

Let x_n is in R and suppose that there is an M in R such that | x_n | less than or equal to M for n in N. Prove that s_n=sup{x_n, x_(n+1), ...} defines a real number for each n in N and that s_1>s_2>....

Expert's answer

Solution

Let xnx_n is in RR and suppose that there is an MM in RR such that xn|x_n| less than or equal to MM for nn in NN. Prove that sn=sup{xn,xn+1,}s_n = \sup\{x_n, x_n + 1, \ldots\} defines a real number for each nn in NN and that s1s2ms_{1} \geq s_{2} \geq m:


M,nN:xnM (comment M0)\exists M, \forall n \in N: |x_n| \leq M \text{ (comment } M \geq 0 \text{)} \Rightarrow


By definition s=sup{xnnN}s = \sup \{x_n \mid n \in N\} follows: Msup{xn}Ms[M;M]sR-M \leq \sup \{x_n\} \leq M \Rightarrow s \in [-M; M] \Rightarrow s \in R

By condition: sr=sup{xnnN{1,2,3,,r1}}s_r = \sup \{x_n \mid n \in N \setminus \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, r-1\}\}

But rN:sr=sup{xnnN{1,2,3,,r1}}=sr=sup{xnn(N{1,2,3,,r}){r}}=sup{sr+1;xr}nN:sr+1s1s2s3snsn+1\forall r \in N: s_r = \sup \{x_n \mid n \in N \setminus \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, r-1\}\} = s_r = \sup \{x_n \mid n \in (N \setminus \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, r\}) \cup \{r\}\} = \sup \{s_{r+1}; x_r\} \geq \forall n \in N: s_{r+1} \Rightarrow s_1 \geq s_2 \geq s_3 \geq \ldots s_n \geq s_{n+1}

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS