let S subset R be nonempty. show that if u= supremum S, then for every number n element N the number (u-1)/n is not an upper bound of S, but the number (u+1)/n is an upper bound of S.
1
Expert's answer
2011-08-19T14:57:01-0400
1) Let's prove the first part. Assume that there is some n element N such that (u-1/n) is an upper bound of S. By the definition supremum is the lowest upper bound. But easy to see that (u-1/n) < u and thus u isn't the lowest bound. So it's not true that there is some n element N such that (u-1/n) is an upper bound of S. It means that for every number n element N the number (u-1/n) is not an upper bound of S. 2) Let's prove the second part. For any x element S it's true that x <= u, because u = sup S. At the same time for any n element N it's true that u < u+1/n So we have for any x element S: x <= u < u+1/n. From the transitivity of real numbers x < u+1/n Thus for any n element N (u+1/n) is greater than any element of S, which means that (u+1/n) is an upper bound.
Numbers and figures are an essential part of our world, necessary for almost everything we do every day. As important…
APPROVED BY CLIENTS
Finding a professional expert in "partial differential equations" in the advanced level is difficult.
You can find this expert in "Assignmentexpert.com" with confidence.
Exceptional experts! I appreciate your help. God bless you!
Comments
Dear manish, our proof is complete. What do you want to be done?
prove converse of this .
Leave a comment