Question #30338

In this chapter a decision tree was developed for John Thompson. After completing the analysis, John was not completely sure that he is indifferent to risk. After going through a number of standard gambles, John was able to assess his utility for money. Here are some of the utility assessments: U( - $190,000) = 0, U( - $180,000) = 0.15,
U(- $30,000) = 0.10, U(-$20,000) = 0.15,
U (-$10,000) = 0.2, U($0) = 0.3,
($90,000) = 0.5, U($100,000)=0.6 U=($190,000)=.95
and U($200,000) = 1.0. If John maximizes his expected utility, does his decision change?

Expert's answer

U($190,000)=0,U($180,000)=0.15,\mathrm{U}(-\$190,000) = 0, \mathrm{U}(-\$180,000) = 0.15,U($30,000)=0.10,U($20,000)=0.15,\mathrm{U}(-\$30,000) = 0.10, \mathrm{U}(-\$20,000) = 0.15,U($10,000)=0.2,U($0)=0.3,\mathrm{U}(-\$10,000) = 0.2, \mathrm{U}(\$0) = 0.3,($90,000)=0.5,U($100,000)=0.6,U=($190,000)=0.95(\$90,000) = 0.5, \mathrm{U}(\$100,000) = 0.6, \mathrm{U} = (\$190,000) = 0.95U($200,000)=1.0.\mathrm{U}(\$200,000) = 1.0.


From this schedule we can see the dependence between U and x($)x(\$). We also see that U increases when xϵ($190000;$180000)($30000;$200000)x\epsilon(-\$190000; -\$180000) \cup (-\$30000; \$200000) and decreases when xϵ($180000;$30000)x\epsilon(-\$180000; -\$30000).

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS