Evaluate det(−A) and det(−AT). Compare det(−A) and det(−AT) for:
(2.1) A = −4 2
3 −3 ;
(2.2) A = 3 1 −2
−5 3 −6
−1 0 −4
2.1)
det( A ) = "\\begin{vmatrix}\n -4 & 2 \\\\\n 3 & -3 \\\\\n\\end{vmatrix}"
∴ det( -A ) = "\\begin{vmatrix}\n 4 & -2 \\\\\n -3 & 3\n\\end{vmatrix}"
Expanding along 1st row, we have
det(-A) = 4 * 3 - (- 3 ) * (- 2 )
det( -A ) = 6
Again, det( - AT) = "\\begin{vmatrix}\n 4 & -3 \\\\\n -2 & 3 \\\\\n\\end{vmatrix}"
Expanding along 1st row, we have
det(-A) = 4 * 3 - (- 2 ) * (- 3 )
det(-AT) = 6
Hence, we see that det( -A ) = det(-AT) .
2.2)
det(A) = "\\begin{vmatrix}\n 3 & 1 & -2 \\\\\n -5 & 3 & -6 \\\\\n-1&0&-4\\\\\n\\end{vmatrix}"
So, det( - A ) = "\\begin{vmatrix}\n -3 & -1 & 2 \\\\\n 5 & -3 & 6 \\\\\n1&0&4\\\\\n\\end{vmatrix}"
Expanding along 1st row, we have
det(-A) = -3[ ( -3 ) "*" 4 - 0 "*" 6] - ( -1 )[5 "*" 4 - 1 "*" 6] + 2[ 5 "*" 0 - 1 "*" (-3)]
det(-A) = 56
det(- AT) = "\\begin{vmatrix}\n -3 & 5 & 1 \\\\\n -1 & -3 & 0 \\\\\n2&6&4\\\\\n\\end{vmatrix}"
Expanding along 1st row, we have
det(-A) = -3[ ( -3 ) "*" 4 - 6 "*" 0] - 5 [ ( -1 ) "*" 4 - 2 "*" 0] + 1[ ( -1 ) "*" 6 - 2 "*" ( -3 ) ]
det(- AT) = 56
Hence, we see that det( -A ) = det(-AT) .
Comments
Leave a comment