Question #118108

W={(x1, x2, x3)∈R3: x2+x3=0}. Find two subspace W1,W2 of R such that R3= W⊕W1 and R3=W⊕W2 but W1≠W2

Expert's answer

Let denote V=R3V=\mathbb{R}^3 be a real vector space.

Given that W={(x1,x2,x3)∈V∣ x2+x3=0}W=\{(x_1,x_2,x_3) \in V|\: x_2+x_3=0\} subspace of VV .

Let, W1={(x1,x1,x1)∈V:x1∈R}W_1=\{(x_1,x_1,x_1)\in V : x_1\in\mathbb{R}\} and W2={(2x1,−x1,x1)∈V: x1∈R}W_2=\{(2x_1,-x_1,x_1)\in V: \: x_1\in \mathbb{R}\} ,clearly, W,W1,W2W,W_1,W_2 all different as a set.

Claim 1: W1,W2W_1 ,W_2 are subspace of VV

Proof:

Let, a,b,c,d∈Ra,b,c,d \in \mathbb{R} and for every u,v∈W1 & w,y∈W2u,v \in W_1 \: \&\: w,y \in W_2 consider the linear combination as follows,

Case-I: clearly, u=(u1,u1,u1)&v=(v1,v1,v1)u=(u_1,u_1,u_1)\&v=(v_1,v_1,v_1) such that,


au+bv=(au1+bv1,au1+bv1,au1+bv1)au+bv=(au_1+bv_1,au_1+bv_1,au_1+bv_1)


which implies,

au+bv∈W1au+bv\in W_1

Hence W1W_1 is vector subspace.


Case-II: In a similar manner as case-I , consider the

cw+dy∈W2cw+dy\in W_2

Thus our claimed is proved.


Claim 2: V=W⊕W1V=W \oplus W_1

Proof:

Clearly, we see that

V=W+W1V=W+ W_1

Thus we will show that W∩W1={0}W\cap W_1=\{0\} . Suppose for any w∈W∩W1w\in W \cap W_1 such that w≠0w\neq0 ,thus w∈W&w∈W1w\in W \& w\in W_1 which implies,

(x1,x2,−x2)=(x1,x1,x1)  ⟹  (x1,x2,x3)=(0,0,0)(x_1,x_2,-x_2)=(x_1,x_1,x_1)\\\implies (x_1,x_2,x_3)=(0,0,0)

Hence we arrived at contradiction that w≠0w\neq 0 .

Thus,

V=W⊕W1V=W\oplus W_1

We are done.


Claim 3: V=W⊕W2V=W\oplus W_2

Proof:

Observe that W+W2={(3x1,x2−x1,x3+x1):x1,x2,x3∈R}⊃R3W+W_2=\{(3x_1,x_2-x_1,x_3+x_1): x_1,x_2,x_3 \in \mathbb{R}\}\supset \mathbb{R}^3 which implies


V=W+W2(∵W+W1⊂V)V=W+W_2 \hspace{1cm}(\because W+W_1\subset V)

Now, we will show that

W∩W2={0}W\cap W_2=\{0\}

Clearly, exactly applying the same arguments as in claim 2 we get,W∩W2={0}W\cap W_2=\{0\} .

Thus,

V=W⊕W2V=W\oplus W_2

Hence, we are done.


LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS