Show that the two statements ¬∃x∀yP (x, y) and
∀x∃y¬P (x, y), where both quantifiers over the first vari-
able in P (x, y) have the same domain, and both quanti-
fiers over the second variable in P (x, y) have the same
domain, are logically equivalent.
How will you interpret the mathematical concept from the case study to contribute towards logical thinking in emerge mathematics
Let R be reflexive relation on a set A. Show that R ⊆R²?
Let A = {a, b, c}, B = {x, y}. Find the following:
1. A × B
2. B × A
Use the set builder notation to give a description of each of these sets.
1.A = {b, c, d, f, g, h, j, k, l, m, n, p, q, r, s, t, v, w, x, y, z}
2. B = {0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377}
Use the rule of inference to obtain conclusion from the each of the set of premises
“If I play hockey, then I am sore the next day.”
“I use the whirlpool if I am sore.”
“I did not use the whirlpool.”
How many 3-digit numbers can be formed from digits 1 – 5 if:
a. If repetition is allowed?
b. If repetition is not allowed?
How many possible passwords are there for the following conditions: 3
digits followed by 2 letters followed by 4 digits? (3 pts)
false statement by finding a counterexample
let r be a reflexive relation on a set a. show that r ⊆ r2