Question #76224

3. Prove or give a counterexample to the following: For a set A and
binary relation R on A, if R is reflexive and symmetric, then R must
be transitive as well.

Expert's answer

Answer provided by https://www.AssignmentExpert.com

Answer on Question #76224 – Math – Discrete Mathematics

Question

Prove or give a counterexample to the following: For a set AA and binary relation RR on AA, if RR is reflexive and symmetric, then RR must be transitive as well.

Solution

This statement is not true.

Consider the set A={a,b,c}A = \{a, b, c\} and the binary relation


R={(a,a),(b,b),(c,c),(a,b),(b,a),(b,c),(c,b)}R = \{(a, a), (b, b), (c, c), (a, b), (b, a), (b, c), (c, b)\}


on AA. Then RR is reflexive because (a,a),(b,b),(c,c)R(a, a), (b, b), (c, c) \in R, i.e. (x,x)R(x, x) \in R for all xAx \in A. This relation is symmetric because if (x,y)R(x, y) \in R then (y,x)R(y, x) \in R for each x,yAx, y \in A. But RR is not transitive: (a,b)R(a, b) \in R and (b,c)R(b, c) \in R but (a,c)R(a, c) \notin R.

**Answer**: RR is not transitive.

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS