Consider the relation "R_3 = \\{\\ (1,1),(1,2),(1,3),(1,4),(2,1),(2,2),(2,3),(2,4), \\\\\n (3,1),(3,2),(3,3),(3,4),(4,1),(4,2),(4,3),(4,4)\\ \\}"on the set "A=\\{1,2,3,4\\}."
- Since "(a,a)\\in R_3" for each "a\\in A," the relation "R_3" is reflexive. Taking into account that "(a,b)\\in R_3" implies "(b,a)\\in R_3" for any pair "(a,b)\\in R_3," we conclude that the relation "R_3" is symmetric. Since "(1,2)\\in R_3" and "(2,1)\\in R_3," this relation is not anti-symmetric. Taking into account that "(a,b)\\in R_3" and "(b,c)\\in R_3" implies "(a,c)\\in R_3" for any pairs "(a,b),(b,c)\\in R_3," we conclude that the relation "R_3" is transitive.
- Since the relation "R_3" is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, it is an equivalence relation. Taking into account that "R_3" is not anti-symmetric, we conclude that "R_3" is not a partial order.
Comments
Leave a comment