Question #23857

If A=∅
1. Is it an equivalence relation?
2. Is it antisymmetric?

Expert's answer

Question 1

Let A=A=\emptyset.

1. Is it an equivalence relation?

2. Is it antisymmetric?

Solution

1. By definition, a relation AA on XX is an equivalence relation if and only if it is reflexive, i. e. for all xXx\in X:

(x,x)A,(x,x)\in A,

symmetric, i. e. for all x,yXx,y\in X:

(x,y)A(y,x)A(x,y)\in A\Rightarrow(y,x)\in A

and transitive, i. e. for all x,y,zXx,y,z\in X:

(x,y),(y,z)A(x,z)A.(x,y),(y,z)\in A\Rightarrow(x,z)\in A.

So, if XX\neq\emptyset, then A=A=\emptyset cannot be an equivalence relation, because it is not reflexive. Now suppose X=X=\emptyset. Then A==X×XA=\emptyset=X\times X is, obviously, reflexive, symmetric and transitive, because all the premises of the implications above are always false (there are no elements in XX) and hence the implications are true.

2. A relation AA on XX is antisymmetric if for all x,yXx,y\in X:

(x,y),(y,x)Ax=y.(x,y),(y,x)\in A\Rightarrow x=y.

Clearly, if A=A=\emptyset, then the premise of the implication is false, so the implication is true and thus AA is antisymmetric.

Answer:

1. If X=X=\emptyset, then AA is an equivalence relation on XX, otherwise it is not an equivalence relation on XX;

2. AA is antisymmetric.

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS