Question 1
Let .
1. Is it an equivalence relation?
2. Is it antisymmetric?
Solution
1. By definition, a relation on is an equivalence relation if and only if it is reflexive, i. e. for all :
symmetric, i. e. for all :
and transitive, i. e. for all :
So, if , then cannot be an equivalence relation, because it is not reflexive. Now suppose . Then is, obviously, reflexive, symmetric and transitive, because all the premises of the implications above are always false (there are no elements in ) and hence the implications are true.
2. A relation on is antisymmetric if for all :
Clearly, if , then the premise of the implication is false, so the implication is true and thus is antisymmetric.
Answer:
1. If , then is an equivalence relation on , otherwise it is not an equivalence relation on ;
2. is antisymmetric.
∎