Let R be the relation on Z
(the set of integers) defined by
(x, y) R iff x
2 + y2 = 2k for some integers k 0.
Question 15
R is not antisymmetric. Which of the following ordered pairs can be used together in a
counterexample to prove that R is not antisymmetric? (Remember that R is defined on Z
.)
1. (–1, 1) & (1, –1)
2. (5, 9) & (13, 15)
3. (8, 7) & (7, 8)
4. (3, 1) & (1, 3)
Given Relation is-
R={"(x,y);x^2+y^2=2k" } for some integers k.
1.(-1,1)&(1,-1)
"(-1)^2+(1)^2=2k\\implies 2=2k\\implies k=1"
and "(1,-1)\\implies (1)^2+(-1)^2=2k\\implies 2=2k\\implies k=1"
So R is not antisymmetric.
2.(5,9)&(13,15)
"(5,9)\\implies (5)^2+(9)^2=2k\\implies 25+81=2k\\implies k= 68"
For ("13,15) \\implies (13)^2+(15)^2=2k\\implies 169+225=2k\\implies k=197"
So This is antisymmetric.
3.(8,7)&(7,8)
for ("8,7)\\implies (8)^2+(7)^2=2k\\implies 113=2k\\implies k=56.5"
for "(7,8)\\implies (7)^2+(8)^2=2k\\implies 113=2k\\implies k=56.5"
So R is not antisymmetric.
4.(3,1)&(1,3)
for "(3,1)\\implies (3)^2+(1)^2=2k\\implies 10=2k\\implies k=5"
for "(1,3)\\implies (1)^2+(3)^2=2k\\implies 10=2k\\implies k=5"
So R is not antisymmetric.
So, The ordered pair Which are not antisymmetric are (1,-1)&(-1,1), (8,7)&(7,8) and (3,1)&(1,3)
Comments
Leave a comment