Question #178304

Consider

Premises: If there was a cricket match, then traveling was difficult.

If they arrived on time, then traveling was not difficult.

They arrived on time.

Conclusion: There was no cricket match.

Determine whether the conclusion follows logically from the premises. Explain by

representing the statements symbolically and using rules of inference


Expert's answer

Let us use the following notation:

p=p= "There was a cricket match", q=q= "Traveling was difficult", r=r= "They arrived on time".


Then the premises are pq, rqp\to q,\ r\to\overline{q} and rr. The conclusion is p.\overline{p}.


Using to the premises rqr\to \overline{q} and rr the rule of inference Modus Ponens, we conclude q\overline{q}. Then using to p qp\to\ q and q\overline{q} the rule of inference Modus Tollens, we have the conclusion p\overline{p}. Therefore, the conclusion follows logically from the premises.



Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS