Question #178304

Consider

Premises: If there was a cricket match, then traveling was difficult.

If they arrived on time, then traveling was not difficult.

They arrived on time.

Conclusion: There was no cricket match.

Determine whether the conclusion follows logically from the premises. Explain by

representing the statements symbolically and using rules of inference


1
Expert's answer
2021-04-13T13:43:41-0400

Let us use the following notation:

p=p= "There was a cricket match", q=q= "Traveling was difficult", r=r= "They arrived on time".


Then the premises are pq, rqp\to q,\ r\to\overline{q} and rr. The conclusion is p.\overline{p}.


Using to the premises rqr\to \overline{q} and rr the rule of inference Modus Ponens, we conclude q\overline{q}. Then using to p qp\to\ q and q\overline{q} the rule of inference Modus Tollens, we have the conclusion p\overline{p}. Therefore, the conclusion follows logically from the premises.



Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS