Question #172406

Show that -p → (q + r) and q→ (p V r) are logically equivalent.


Expert's answer

Let us find the truth table for  q→(p∨r)q\to (p \lor r):


pqrp∨rq→(p∨r)0000100111010000111110011101111101111111\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline p & q & r & p\lor r & q\to(p\lor r)\\ \hline 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline 1 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array}


It follows that the truth value of ∣q→(p∨r)∣=0|q\to (p \lor r)|=0 if and only if ∣p∣=∣r∣=0|p|=|r|=0, ∣q∣=1|q|=1. On the other hand, for ∣p∣=∣r∣=0|p|=|r|=0, ∣q∣=1|q|=1 we have that ∣q+r∣=1+0=1|q+r|=1+0=1, and therefore by definition of implication, ∣−p→(q+r)∣=1|-p → (q + r)|=1. Consequently, the formulas −p→(q+r)-p → (q + r) and q→(p∨r)q→ (p\lor r) are not logically equivalent.



LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS