Answer to Question #172406 in Discrete Mathematics for Jeron

Question #172406

Show that -p → (q + r) and q→ (p V r) are logically equivalent.


1
Expert's answer
2021-03-18T09:12:18-0400

Let us find the truth table for  "q\\to (p \\lor r)":


"\\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \n\\hline\np & q & r & p\\lor r & q\\to(p\\lor r)\\\\\n\\hline\n0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\\\\n\\hline\n0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\\\\n\\hline\n0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n\\hline\n0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\\\\n\\hline\n1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\\\\n\\hline\n1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\\\\n\\hline\n1 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\\\\n\\hline\n1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{array}"


It follows that the truth value of "|q\\to (p \\lor r)|=0" if and only if "|p|=|r|=0", "|q|=1". On the other hand, for "|p|=|r|=0", "|q|=1" we have that "|q+r|=1+0=1", and therefore by definition of implication, "|-p \u2192 (q + r)|=1". Consequently, the formulas "-p \u2192 (q + r)" and "q\u2192 (p\\lor r)" are not logically equivalent.



Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!

Leave a comment

LATEST TUTORIALS
New on Blog
APPROVED BY CLIENTS