Given set ,
"S=\\{ 1,2,3,4,5,6\\}" and a partition of "S" .
"A_1=\\{ 1,2,3\\}" ,"A_2=\\{ 4,5\\}" and
"A_3=\\{6\\}" .
Let "P=\\{ A_1,A_2,A_3\\}" be the given partition of "S" .
Let a relation "R" be defined in "S" such that ,
"R=\\{ (a,b):" "a \\ and \\ b" are the same number as of the partition "\\}"
Then the relation "R" can listed as
"R=\\{ (1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,1),(1,3),(3,1),"
"(3,1),(2,3),(3,2),(4,4),(5,5),(4,5)"
"(5,4),(6,6)\\}"
Claim: "R" is an equivalence relation in "S"
Clearly, (1) "R" is reflexive as "(x,x)\\in R \\ \\forall \\ x\\in S" .
(2) "R" is symmetric as "(x,y)\\in R \\implies (y,x)\\in R"
Because if "x \\ and \\ y" are member of the same set of partition ,then "y \\ and \\ x" are member of the same set .
(3) "R" is transitive .
Let "(x,y)\\in R" and "(y,z)\\in R"
"\\implies" "(x,y)" belong to the some set "A_i"
in the partition and "(y,z)" belong to the some set "A_j" in the partition.
Since "y\\in A_i" and also "y\\in A_j" ,therefore we have "y\\in A_i \\cap A_j"
i,e "A_i \\cap A_j \\neq \\phi" .
But
"A_i ,A_j \\in P \\implies A_i \\cap A_j=\\phi"
Hence "A_i \\cap A_j \\neq \\phi \\implies A_i =A_j"
"\\therefore x,y,z" belong to same partition .
"\\therefore (x,z)\\in R" .
Hence , "R" is an equivalence relation.
Comments
Leave a comment