Which best describes the given compound propositions [p ∧ (q v r)] <-> [(p ∧ q) v (p ∧ r)]
Taking into account that "\\alpha\\leftrightarrow\\alpha\\equiv T" for any formula "\\alpha" and
"[p \u2227 (q \\lor r)] \\leftrightarrow [(p \u2227 q) \\lor (p \u2227 r)]\\equiv [p \u2227 (q \\lor r)] \\leftrightarrow [p \u2227 (q \\lor r)] \\equiv T,"
we conclude that this formula is tautology and the logic constant "T" the best describes the given compound proposition.
Comments
Leave a comment