Give an example to show, that the sum of two semiprime ideals need not be semiprime.
For , we have . Thus, is given simply by . For , we take . A semiprime ideal contains both and iff . Thus, is indeed the supremum of and in . This shows that is a lattice. Clearly, has a largest element, , and a smallest element, .
In the above construction, we cannot replace by , since may not be semiprime. For an explicit example of this, consider , in which and are (semi)prime ideals (since ). Here,
Is not semiprime (since ), and we have
Alternatively, we could have also taken and , for which , is not semiprime. Here is again .
In spite of these examples, there are many rings in which we do have for semiprime ideals and . These include, for instance, von Neumann regular rings, and left (right) artinian rings, as you can easily verify. The ring is another example: here, is semiprime as long as one of is semiprime!
Comment. The in this exercise is actually a complete lattice, in the sense that "sup" and "inf" exist for arbitrary subsets in . If , the infimum is given as before by the semiprime ideal , and the supremum is given by the semiprime ideal .