If an ideal is contained in union of two ideals then show that it is wholly contained in one of them
Suppose are ideals of a ring such that . We want to prove that or .
We will suppose the contrary : suppose that nor , in this case we should have with and . By definition of the ideal, we have , so we should have or (by definition of a union). Suppose it's in without loss of generality. We then should have by definition of an ideal (as ). This contradicts the hypothesis . By contradiction, we conclude that is contained in or in .
Comments