Answer to Question #19104 in Abstract Algebra for edward

Question

This is not a math problem. Because there is no philosophy to choose in the subject.

premises:∀x [(Cube(x) ∧ Large(x)) ∨ (Tet(x) ∧ Small(x))]
∀x [Tet(x) → BackOf(x, c)]
conclusion:∀x [Small(x) → BackOf(x, c)]

give an informal proof. If it is not valid, use Tarski's World to construct a counter example.

Answer 1

Unfortunately, your question requires a lot of work and cannot be done for free.
Submit it with all requirements as an assignment to our control panel and we'll assist you.