Question #16728

For any ring k, let A = Mn(k) and let R (resp. S) denote the ring of n × n upper (resp. lower) triangular matrices over k. Suppose k has an anti-automorphism (resp. involution). Show that the same is true for A,R and S.

Expert's answer

To simplify the notations, we shall work in the (sufficiently typical) case n=3n = 3. Suppose ε:kk\varepsilon : k \to k is an anti-automorphism (resp. involution). Composing the transpose map with ε\varepsilon on matrix entries, we can define δ0:AA\delta_0 : A \to A with


δ0(abcdefghi)=(ε(a)ε(d)ε(g)ε(b)ε(e)ε(h)ε(c)ε(f)ε(i))\delta_0 \begin{pmatrix} a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon(a) & \varepsilon(d) & \varepsilon(g) \\ \varepsilon(b) & \varepsilon(e) & \varepsilon(h) \\ \varepsilon(c) & \varepsilon(f) & \varepsilon(i) \end{pmatrix}


It is easy to check that this δ0\delta_0 is an anti-automorphism (resp. involution) of AA, and therefore so is δ:=αδ0\delta := \alpha \circ \delta_0 given by


δ(abcdefghi)=(ε(i)ε(f)ε(c)ε(h)ε(e)ε(b)ε(g)ε(d)ε(a))\delta \begin{pmatrix} a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon(i) & \varepsilon(f) & \varepsilon(c) \\ \varepsilon(h) & \varepsilon(e) & \varepsilon(b) \\ \varepsilon(g) & \varepsilon(d) & \varepsilon(a) \end{pmatrix}


By inspection, we see that this δ\delta restricts to anti-automorphisms (resp. involutions) on the subrings RR and SS of AA.

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS