Other Law Answers

Joseph, a businessman employed John as a driver of his van. Joseph had expressly forbidden John from giving a lift to any unauthorized person and affixed a notice to this effect on the dashboard of the van. Nevertheless, John gave a lift to Peter, an unauthorized person, who was killed after an accident owing to John’s negligent driving. Peter’s widow wants to know her rights against Joseph and John. Advice the widow

Alex, a commission agent is employed by Peter to sell Peter’s land to ZQ Company Ltd in which he is both a shareholder and director but he does not disclose this fact to Peter. After selling the land, Alex makes a claim for payment of commission which Peter refuses to pay after discovering Alex’s connection with ZQ Company Ltd. Advise Alex over his right of payment.

Kamau writes to Gitau offering to sell him his car at ksh. 500,000. Gitau accepts the offer subject to the price being reduced to Ksh.450, 000. Kamau is not willing to sell the car for Shs.450,000. Gitau writes back and agrees to buy the car for Shs.500, 000. Kamau has refused to sell the car and Gitau is aggrieved. Advise Gitau on the legal position of the situation.

Equity remains an unwritten source of law and all that exist in writing are the maxims of equity. Explain the doctrine of equity and highlight eight maxims of equity.

Paul and Paulina own a private limited company known as “Permata Gemilang Sdn Bhd”. The company’s nature of business is to sell poultry products like fresh chicken meat and frozen foods. Paulina has appointed Jack as the company’s agent to sell their poultry products in Johor Bahru. Normally, the estimated profit from the transaction will be around RM600-RM800 per sale and purchase. The agency contract has never been in written form, but mainly by verbal promise of the Company to pay commission amounting to 25% from the profit gained by Jack. It is agreed that Jack is not the company’s salaried employee.
On 23/12/2013, Jack was instructed to sell the company’s product in Johor Bahru for the estimated value of RM2,000.00. While en route to his destination, Jack realized that the products began to produce a stench and rotten smell. To his worry, he checked the product and found that some of them were already rotten. To avoid further loss, Jack conducted car booth sales of the remaining poultry products to other people at cheaper price. The cumulative profit is only RM240.00.
Paulina is upset with the situation and refuses to pay commission to Jack despite taking away the profit (RM240.00) from him. She claims that Jack should not have disposed the goods without her permission. On the other hand, Jack responds that Permata Gemilang would suffer more loss if he did not sell anything, and continuing the journey will cause more damage to the products.
Answer all the arising issues in the light of Agency Law in Malaysia. Refer to related provisions in the Contract Act 1950 and case laws (if any) as supporting authorities.

On 1/1/2014, Adriana , Mary and Amy agreed to incorporate a partnership known as “AMA” to manage their business of selling fruits, vegetables and other organic stuffs under the label “Segar Sentiasa”. They agreed to inject equal capital of RM10,000 from each partner, and in return everyone shall be entitled to equal profit sharing throughout the business.
Being the daughter of a famous millionaire, Adriana proposed for the firm to rent one of her father’s shop buildings at Damansara for a mere annual payment of RM5,000. Adriana encouraged all the partners to agree to the suggestion because the low rental rate will protect the firm from unnecessary liability in the future. Considering this as a very good proposal, all partners agreed, and they subsequently executed the Tenancy Agreement on 1/2/2014.
To ensure the firm’s products meet consumer needs, Mary went to meet Prof. Ser Ba Tau at UPM for a detailed research information on the nutrition contained in organic products. Prof Ser Ba Tau agreed to sell his own research outcome (which contains some of new patent in certain local vegetables and fruits claimed to be “unknown vitamins”) for the price of RM80,000. Since the professor’s explanation was so persuasive, Mary was convinced to purchase the patent. On 28/2/2014, Mary paid RM40, 000 to Prof Ser Ba Tau and promised to pay the remaining balance in 3 months.
Meanwhile, Amy has been entrusted by the other partners to do the marketing and sales for “AMA” due to her talent in marketing skills. Throughout her various contacts with many people, Amy met Zack who represented himself as the Director of TNB Berhad. To her surprise, Zack proposed “AMA” to execute a contract to allow TNB Berhad to install one electrical wiring station in their building, and in return AMA will receive RM2,000.00 per month. Excited with the offer, on 25/3/2014, Amy executed the contract on behalf of the firm without informing the other partners.
On 3/4/2014, Adriana was surprised when she saw people coming to the firm’s building to install the electrical wiring station. Adriana confronted Amy about this and argued that Amy’s single decision over the matter is not acceptable for the firm’s benefit. It turned out that, the electrical station was not installed by TNB Berhad but BNB Sdn Bhd, a small wiring company. Amy did not realise that earlier because she did not peruse the content of the contract which clearly states that the party to the contract is BNB Sdn Bhd (not TNB Berhad as claimed by Zack), with nominal gratuity payment of RM500.00 per month.
AMA firm is now suffering a great loss and cannot sustain more liability in the future. Adriana proposed for the firm to be dissolved. However, AMA suddenly received a demand letter from Prof Ser Ba Tau claiming the balance of RM40,000.00 for the sale and purchase of his pattern.
Adriana is upset with the situation. She has come to you to resolve the above complication.
Explain to Adriana all arising legal issues with reference to the Partnership Act 1961. Justify your answer with related cases

Dato’ Adlan and Datin Azlin are real estate brokers of Malaysia and they love to acquire fixed assets as their future investment. On 3/1/2014, while window-shopping at KLCC, Datin Azlin was approached by Mr. Guna from Laguna Developer, a promising local developer promoting luxurious condominiums at Bukit Angkasa for sales below market price. Mr. Guna handed over a colorful and attractive brochure of such condominiums to Datin Azlin.
Back at home, , Datin Azlin explained to Dato Adlan about the above attractive housing package. Among other benefits offered are three parking lots for each parcel, fully furnished furniture, SPA & Hair Salons within the condominium compound, and entitlement to free membership of Laguna Golf Club. Dato Adlan, being an avid golfer, was interested with the package.
On the following day, Dato’ Adlan and Datin Azlin agreed to pay the booking fee amounting to RM1,600.00 for a parcel and subsequently perfected the Sale and Purchase Agreement with the panel solicitor of Laguna Developer (Reeni & Associates) for a purchase price of RM960,000.00. Dato’ Adlan paid the whole purchase price without any deferred payment.

Upon receipt of the parcel key, Dato’ Adlan and Datin Azlin eagerly rushed to see their new condominium at Bukit Angkasa. To their surprise, the buildings look shabby with limited space for parking. Datin Azlin was informed by the guard that every parcel owner is only entitled to one parking space, not three as stated in the brochure. Unhappy with this condition, Dato’ Adlan suggested to his wife to further check their parcel unit. To their dismay, the decoration resembles a low cost flat with torn out cushions and a plastic dining table with one broken chair. They went through the whole building and found no SPA & Hair Salons available as claimed in the brochure. Dato’ Adlan also took note that Laguna Golf Club does exist but it requires an annual fee for membership at the price of RM4,500.00 per subscriber.

The couple believe they have been misrepresented by Laguna Developer, and they wish to initiate legal proceeding against the developer.
a) Explain elements of misrepsentation of facts under the Malaysian Contract Law.
b) Can Dato Adlan initiate legal action against Laguna Developer? Justify your answer with reference to case laws and provision of the Malaysian Contract Act 1950.
c) Briefly distinguish misrepresentation and fraud under the Malaysian Contract Act 1950.

A steel cylinder contains no matter within its walls. Wht happens to the gas pressure within the cylinder when it is heated?

Dear sir/madam
I written my GATE 2014 exam and I am not apply to ME. But now I want to study ME. Can I do this.

My family and my dads side of the family are renting a house at the beach for 2 weeks and there is a glass elevator and my grandma says we have to be 16 or older to ride the elevator by ourselves and if we are under 16 we have ride with a adult. I am 13 and have rode in a elevator by myself before in public. Is this rule fair?