1. Name three fundamental rights entrenched in chapter 2 of Constitution that the SCA Protected with their decision in this judgement (3)
2.Malperformance in terms of a contract can be due to fraud or negligence on the part of the debtor . Explain the Roman law test for negligence , which is still the basis for the modern South Africa "reasonable person test " . Answer in your own words and ensure that your answer does not exceed 200 words .( 3)
3. Alfred and African carpets incorporated did not comclude written contract of purchase and sale . is their sales agreement valid if it was concluded verbally ? Explain your answer .
4. Is Africa carpets incorporated correct in their opinion that Alfred because the owner of the carpeting when he left their showroom ? Explain your answer (3) .
The South African have the right for life, human dignity and security which are protected through the judgement.
In comparison to intention, negligence is a lower kind of blame. It is easier for the prosecution to show and typically results in a shorter term than a conviction for the same action if the type of blame is intentional. As a result, a conviction for criminally negligent homicide usually carries a less term than murder.
The agreement between Alfred and African was not valid because there was not prove for agreement in terms of writing to be used incase of disagreement between the two parties.
The African carpets are not aware of the owner of the showrooms as it was just an opinion which was not justified.
Comments
Leave a comment