1. Consider the following model of a hypothetical market for MSW management services:
MPB = 18.35 − 2Q
MPC = 2 + Q
MEC = 0.25Q,
where Q is the number of trash containers per household per month.
A. Quantitatively determine the effect of the resource misallocation due to:
i. the presence of the negative externality, and
ii. the use of a flat fee pricing system in the presence of a negative externality.
B. Determine the dollar value of a waste-end charge that would restore efficiency to this market. Explain your answer intuitively.
a).
i)
For equilibrium: Demand = Supply
Therefore, 18.35 − 2Q = 2 + Q
16.35 = 3Q
Therefore, Q= 5.45
Equilibrium quantity is 5.45 at price p
p = 18.35 + 2 (5.45)
p = 29.25
The above equilibrium is when externality is not incorporated nin the supply function.
When we consider the cost of externality the supply function will be
S' = MPC +MEC
S '= 2 + Q + 0.25Q
Demand = S'
18.35 − 2Q = 2+ 1.25Q
Therefore, Q' = 5.0308
When externality is considered, the output reduces to 5.0308.
When negative externality is not considered, resource misallocation of 0.4192 will be provided to the market.
ii).
Flat fee system is a system when a constant fee is applied irrespective of quantity.
Therefore, MPC ie the cost of additional waste management service is zero
MPC = 0
under Equilibrium MPB = MPC
18.35 − 2Q = 0
Q =9.175
Therefore, resource misallocation is 9.175 - 5.45 =3.725
b)
Waste end charge is the cost charged at the time of waste disposal and it is dependent on the quantity of waste generated. To restore efficiency, dollar value of waste minus end charge should be equal to MPC -MEC at a socially optimum level of output. to cover both the private cost of waste plus the cost of externality. Socially optimum level of output is 5.0308. Marginal social cost at this point is 8.2884. Therefore, the fee should be 8.2884 per unit.
Comments
Leave a comment