a)
To calculate equilibrium,
set "Q_D=Q_S"
"5600-8P=500+4P\\\\5600-500=4P+8P\\\\5100=12P\\\\P=\\frac{5100}{12}\\\\P=425"
Substituting p into QD
"Q_D=5600-8P\\\\\\implies Q=5600-(8\\times425)\\\\Q=2200"
b)
"Q_D=5600-8P\\\\8P=5600-Q_D\\\\P=700-0.125Q_D\\\\Q_S=500+4P\\\\4P=Q_S-500\\\\P=0.25Q_S-125"
Consumer surplus=Area A
"=0.5(700-425)\\times2200\\\\=302,500"
Producer surplus = area B
"=0.5(425-125)\\times 2200\\\\=330,000"
sum of consumer and producer surplus
"302,500+330,00=632,500"
c)
d)
Eventually, the market will settle at the quantity supplied corresponding to $350 rent.
"Q_S=500+4P\\\\=500+4(350)\\\\=1900"
QD at P=350
"Q_D=5600-8P\\\\=5600-8(350)\\\\=2800"
There will be a shortage of 2800-1900=900 apartments
e)
Gain=consumer surplus, Area A
"Area\\space A=(425-350)\\times 1900=142,500"
Loss in consumer surplus
consumer reservation price corresponding to 1900
"P=700-0.125(1900)=462.5"
Difference in Q
"=2200-1900\\\\=300"
"Area\\space B=0.5(462.5-425)\\times (2200-1900)\\\\=5625"
So the loss in consumer surplus is 5625
Area C is loss in producer surplus not offset by gain in consumer surplus. The net changes are thus b ( lost consumer surplus) and C ( lost producer suplus)
f)
The policy ths results in a dead weight loss.
The dead weight loss =lost C.S + lost P.S
"=5625+11250\\\\=16,875"
The town council should not implement the policy.
Comments
Leave a comment