Evaluate whether it violated or justify WARP conditionality: A consumer makes the
following choices (when you develop the matrix, show the calculation process for the first row)
a. At prices (p 1 ,p 2 )=($4,$4) the choice was (x 1 ,x 2 ) = (20,2).
b. At (p 1 ,p 2 )=($4,$2) the choice was (x 1 ,x 2 ) = (10,10).
c. At (p 1 ,p 2 )=($2,$4) the choice was (x 1 ,x 2 ) = (10,8)
Calculation of the first row; At the price ($4,$4) and choice (20,4) ; 20x4 + 4x4 = 16
At the price ($4,$4) and choice (10,10) ; 4x10 + 4x10= 80
At the price ($4,$4) and choice (10,8) ; 10x4 + 4x8 = 72
The numbers in bold and diagonal are the numbers representing the cost of purchasing the bundles
while the numbers other than these shows the amount that the consumer c=would have spent if he does not purchase these are the bundles
When bundle A is purchased, B and C are affordable but when B is purchased bundle A is not affordable and also, when Bundle C is purchased, Bundle A is not affordable
In situation A, Bundle A is directly revealed preferred over B and C
In situation B, Bundle B is directly revealed preferred over C
in situation C, Bundle C is directly revealed preferred over B and A
Thus, this data does not violate WARP
The data does not violate WARP
Comments
Leave a comment