Solution:
Find the inverse demand function:
Q = 190 – 3P
"P = 190 - \\frac{Q}{3}"
Derive the revenue function:
"TR = (\\frac{190}{3 } - \\frac{Q}{3 })\\times Q = \\frac{190Q}{3 } - \\frac{Q^{2} }{3 }"
"TR = \\frac{190Q}{3 } - \\frac{Q^{2} }{3 }"
Derive MR:
"\\frac{\\partial TR} {\\partial Q} = \\frac{190} {3} - \\frac{2Q} {3}"
Set MR = MC:
"\\frac{190} {3} - \\frac{2Q} {3} = 10"
Multiply both sides by 3:
190 – 30 = 2Q
2Q = 160
Q = 80
Derive Price by substituting in the inverse demand function:
"P = \\frac{190} {3} - \\frac{Q} {3}"
"P = \\frac{190} {3} - \\frac{80} {3} = P = \\frac{110} {3} = 36.67" P = 190/3 – 80/3 = 110/3 = 36.67
Price = 36.67
Revenue = P "\\times" Q = 36.67"\\times" 80 = 2933.6
Costs = MC "\\times" Q = 10 "\\times" 80 = 800
Profit = 2,933.6 – 800 = 2,133.6
The first firm can lower its marginal cost to 5 by making an investment of 100. This is because the marginal costs of production are weakly decreasing in the amount of additional investment.
Comments
Leave a comment